BLAU-GELBER Speaker´s Corner


Fem Fan

Recommended Posts

Dauer-ASB-Surfer

Das neue Rapidstadion bekommt eine Kapelle, Rapidfans können sich dort trauen und ihre Kinder taufen lassen. Die Idee kommt sicher vom Krankl, das hat er in Barcelona gesehen. :D

Ich finde es ja faszinierend, dass ausgerechnet der traditionell der SPÖ nahestehende Arbeiterklub

Rapid so ein Faible für Religion bzw. Katholizismus hat. Schon ihr erster Fußballplatz hieß

Pfarrwiese.

Diesen Beitrag teilen


Link zum Beitrag
Auf anderen Seiten teilen

Ich finde es ja faszinierend, dass ausgerechnet der traditionell der SPÖ nahestehende Arbeiterklub

Rapid so ein Faible für Religion bzw. Katholizismus hat. Schon ihr erster Fußballplatz hieß

Pfarrwiese.

sorry für's beckmessern, aber die pfarrwiese war die vorletzte platz, davor war man im (heutigen) 15. bezirk angesiedelt.

Diesen Beitrag teilen


Link zum Beitrag
Auf anderen Seiten teilen

Mamarazza i.R.

Ich finde es ja faszinierend, dass ausgerechnet der traditionell der SPÖ nahestehende Arbeiterklub

Rapid so ein Faible für Religion bzw. Katholizismus hat.

Pfarrwiese.

?Hab mir dasselbe gedacht...

Diesen Beitrag teilen


Link zum Beitrag
Auf anderen Seiten teilen

Tachinierer

Und die Rapidler legen noch eins drauf, zukünftig wird Rapids Website unter www.nummereins.wien abrufbar sein.

In Favoriten wird man sich violett ärgern...

Ist dann halt peinlich, wenn man dann in einer der nächsten Saisonen hinter der Austria landet...

Diesen Beitrag teilen


Link zum Beitrag
Auf anderen Seiten teilen

interessanter kurzer artikel von mckinsey, der für nicht damit befasste schön zusammenfasst, woran man ermessen kann, ob sich sportsponsorings auszahlen (wenn sposoring für den sponsor keinen nutzen bringt, wären die dafür verantwortlichen auf sponsorseite schnell beim delikt der untreue oder kämen ihr zumindest nahe): http://www.mckinsey.com/Insights/Marketing_Sales/Is_sports_sponsorship_worth_it?cid=other-eml-alt-mip-mck-oth-1406

Is sports sponsorship worth it?

How much value is generated from sponsoring the World Cup? Or its superstars, such as Lionel Messi or Cristiano Ronaldo? Here are five metrics that are crucial to finding out.

June 2014| byJeff Jacobs, Pallav Jain, and Kushan Surana

The Fédération Internationale de Football Association stands to make $1.4 billion from sponsorship deals with 20 major companies during the World Cup in Brazil. That’s 10 percent more sponsorship revenue than from the last World Cup, in South Africa.1 1.Débora Montesinos, “FIFA to reap US $1.4 billion in sponsorship revenues from Brazil 2014,” Portada, January 27, 2014, latam.portada-online.com. Although significant, that’s still far below US corporate spending on sports sponsorships, which grew to an estimated $20 billion in 2013—equal to one-third of total US television advertising and one-half of digital advertising.

Considering the huge amounts involved, you would imagine sponsors of athletes and events have clear answers when asked about their return on investment (ROI). You would be wrong. Industry research reveals that about one-third to one-half of US companies don’t have a system in place to measure sponsorship ROI comprehensively. And that’s costly in another way: in our experience, executives who implement a comprehensive approach to gauge the impact of their sponsorships can increase returns by as much as 30 percent.

Scoring sponsorships

To manage sponsorship spending effectively, advertisers must first articulate a clear sponsorship strategy—the overall objective of their portfolio, the target demographic, and which stages of the consumer decision journey (awareness, consideration, purchase, loyalty) sponsorships can support.2 2.David Court et al., “The consumer decision journey,” McKinsey Quarterly, June 2009. Companies should then implement a complete marketing ROI program based on five metrics to measure the performance of sponsorship spending:

1. Cost per reach. Marketing executives should evaluate cost per reach—the number of people exposed to the sponsorship in person as well as through media such as TV, radio, and print— on a quarterly basis using data from internal sources or the sponsorship agency. Costs include not only rights fees but also activation costs (for example, promotional booths and merchandise) and advertising. Reach calculations should favor exposure to the target demographic over total numbers.

To monitor worldwide sponsorships using cost per reach, one retailer built a database using cost and reach data from its agency, the sponsors, and publicly available sources. Analysis revealed that 15 percent of its properties were twice the average cost per reach as others. Some sponsorships (such as a premier sports team) had high costs while others (a music concert, for instance) delivered low reach. The database also identified the sponsorships that did not reach the advertiser’s target demographic. With these insights, the company reallocated its sponsorship dollars to better vehicles that increased overall reach by 20 percent at the same cost.

2. Unaided awareness per reach. We find that companies often spend a lot of money acquiring sponsorship rights but very little on activation—that is, marketing activities such as promotional booths and merchandise to promote the sponsorship. Our experience, as well as IEG research from 2011, shows wide variance: for every $1 spent on sponsorship rights, companies devote anywhere from $0.50 to $1.60 to activation. That means many corporations skimp, missing huge opportunities to magnify a sponsorship’s impact on sales or awareness. One US consumer-packaged-goods company, for example, allocated 80 percent of its sponsorship budget to rights fees and only 20 percent to activation. After analyzing its efforts, it found that increased activation resulted in greater unaided awareness and higher brand recall. With this insight, the company shifted resources from its low-performing properties to increase activation for its standout sponsorships, increasing unaided awareness of them by 15 percent.

3. Sales/margin per dollar spent. Linking sales directly to sponsorships is typically challenging, but two approaches can help to quantify it. The first is a two-step approach that ties spending on sponsorships to key qualitative marketing measures such as unaided awareness, propensity to buy, and willingness to consider. It then tracks the impact of each variable on short- and long-term sales. The second approach, based on econometrics, uses data on spending and reach (among a host of other media variables) over an extended period to establish links between sponsorships and sales, and then isolate the impact of sponsorships from other marketing and sales activities.

A handset manufacturer, for example, followed the first method, setting up a quarterly consumer survey to measure the impact of sponsorship on sales. By conducting advanced analysis on the data set, the company was able to identify the sponsorships that were truly driving consumer willingness to consider the company’s products, which it then linked to sales. The analysis showed a tenfold ROI difference between the top-quartile and bottom-quartile sponsorships. The company now uses this method to help with negotiations during yearly reviews of its sponsorships.

4. Long-term brand attributes. Sponsorships have the potential to reach beyond short-term sales to build a brand’s identity. Brand strength contributes 60 to 80 percent to overall sales,3 3.Thomas Bauer, Jonathan Gordon, and Dennis Spillecke, “The dawn of marketing’s next golden age: $200 billion and counting” (PDF–136KB), McKinsey on Marketing & Sales, November 2013. making this benefit critical for sustained, long-term sales growth. A qualitative assessment or survey can help companies identify the brand attributes that each sponsorship property supports. Analysis of those results helps marketers determine which sponsorships are reinforcing a common brand theme. The handset manufacturer above used surveys to determine that a number of its sponsorship properties were misaligned with the brand attributes it wanted to convey—some actually had a negative ROI. The advertiser shed the poor-performing sponsorships and developed new messaging and activation plans for the others.

5. Indirect benefits. Sponsorships may stimulate indirect sales—for instance, when advertisers host executives at sponsored events or when they’re part of a balance-of-trade commitment. Therefore, any analysis of sponsorships must also account for these indirect benefits. Companies often either neglect or overestimate these sources of revenue when calculating ROI. A financial institution, for example, used its sponsorship of a golf tournament to host clients for its wealth-management business. Analysis revealed that the impact of the tournament on indirect sales covered the sponsorship costs, making it one of the most effective sponsorships in its portfolio.

Sponsorships have become an integral component of marketing strategy. Yet many companies still do not effectively quantify the impact of these expenditures, even for events requiring significant spending such as the World Cup. A systematic commitment to a menu of analytics approaches allows executives to identify sponsorships that create value as well as those that don’t live up to their names.

For more from McKinsey on the topic of marketing and sales, visit the McKinsey on Marketing & Sales website.

About the authors

Jeff Jacobs is a principal in McKinsey’s Chicago office, Pallav Jain is a principal in the Atlanta office, and Kushan Surana is a consultant in the New York office.

Diesen Beitrag teilen


Link zum Beitrag
Auf anderen Seiten teilen

Mamarazza i.R.

Jetzt gibt es sie, die "Admira Neu", Rechtsanwalt Rebernig, wir kennen ihn, ;) war der Geburtshelfer. So ähnlich sollte bei uns das irgendwann mal hoffentlich auch funktionieren, Begriffe wie "Moderne Vereinsstruktur mit einem Sponsoring auf breiter Basis", gefallen irgendwie und die Wortwahl im Zusammenhang mit Trenkwalder "schwierige undurchsichtige Verflechtungen zwischen dem Hauptsponsor und dem Verein" kann einen schon an die Situation bei uns erinnern ...

Hier der Scan aus der Krone NÖ

post-5867-0-21785300-1403085487_thumb.jp

Diesen Beitrag teilen


Link zum Beitrag
Auf anderen Seiten teilen

Top-Schriftsteller

Rebernig in allen Gassen, zweifellos recht erfolgreich. Meiner Meinung nach sollte jeder Verein seinen eigenen, womöglich ehrenamtlichen Rechtsberater haben, der im Fußballgeschäft nicht auf zig Hochzeiten tanzt.

Diesen Beitrag teilen


Link zum Beitrag
Auf anderen Seiten teilen

Tachinierer

Rebernig in allen Gassen, zweifellos recht erfolgreich. Meiner Meinung nach sollte jeder Verein seinen eigenen, womöglich ehrenamtlichen Rechtsberater haben, der im Fußballgeschäft nicht auf zig Hochzeiten tanzt.

Rebernig betonte auf der GV, dass er Vereinsmitglied sein und deutete an, dass seine Arbeit (vermutlich teilweise?) ehrenamtlich sei, wenn ich mich richtig erinnere.

Diesen Beitrag teilen


Link zum Beitrag
Auf anderen Seiten teilen

Rebernig betonte auf der GV, dass er Vereinsmitglied sein und deutete an, dass seine Arbeit (vermutlich teilweise?) ehrenamtlich sei, wenn ich mich richtig erinnere.

ich habe den folgenden satz (sinngemäß, eher nicht wortwörtlich) in erinnerung: "sie werden keine einzige rechnung von mir an die vienna finden."

Diesen Beitrag teilen


Link zum Beitrag
Auf anderen Seiten teilen

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Gast
Auf dieses Thema antworten...

×   Du hast formatierten Text eingefügt.   Formatierung jetzt entfernen

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Dein Link wurde automatisch eingebettet.   Einbetten rückgängig machen und als Link darstellen

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Lädt...


  • Folge uns auf Facebook

  • Partnerlinks

  • Unsere Sponsoren und Partnerseiten

  • Wer ist Online

    • Keine registrierten Benutzer online.